Obama has no leg to stand on

From Thomas Sowell:

The party line that we are likely to be hearing from now until the November elections is that Obama “inherited” the big federal budget deficits and that he has to “clean up the mess” left in the economy by the Republicans. This may convince those who want to be convinced, but it will not stand up under scrutiny.

No President of the United States can create either a budget deficit or a budget surplus. All spending bills originate in the House of Representatives and all taxes are voted into law by Congress.

Democrats controlled both houses of Congress before Barack Obama became president. The deficit he inherited was created by the Congressional Democrats, including Senator Barack Obama, who did absolutely nothing to oppose the runaway spending. He was one of the biggest of the big spenders.

This is a great point to stump blame-anything-but-Socialism liberals, although Thomas Sowell seems a little more protective of “I’ve abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system” Bush than is warranted.

Posted in Economics | Tagged , | Leave a comment

money can buy happiness

Whoever first stated that “money can not buy happiness” probably never owned a HP Touchsmart Tm2t.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

most asinine quote of the day

Fox News reports:

Helmke also says he gets “nervous” when gun advocates “talk about taking up arms against the government.” He explained, “When someone thinks that they, on their own, can decide that somehow the government is tyrannical and that they can start a revolution, start a civil war, then we’re not following the process that our founding fathers set up.”

Wait? What?
I don’t know, but I would venture to say that the exact opposite of what Helmke says is true. I was under the impression that our founding fathers took up arms over a small tax on a few luxury items and the government disarming one city.

Not only did our founding fathers not discourage armed rebellion against tyrannical governments, they were the original practitioners of armed revolt for minor infractions. If he were to quote our founding fathers as being only too eager to sacrifice life over petty disputes, he would be closer to the truth. After all, back in the founder’s days, people were all too eager to invade countries, end lives, and engaging in generally uncivil behaviors.

Posted in History, Human Nature | Tagged , | Leave a comment

the Christian case against copyright

In this video I explain why Copyrights, Patents and Intellectual Property are not moral laws. I show they are a fictional concept not identified as a sin in the Bible.

Posted in dinosaurs will die, Intellectual Property, Morality, Theology, videos | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Christian vigilantism

I examine the morality behind unilateral vigilante action. I examine the Biblical texts in regards to vigilantism, and show that vigilantism is not morally wrong.

Posted in Christian Maxim, Morality, Theology, videos | Leave a comment

predestination – a prohorizo exegesis

In this video the word Predestine in the Bible is examined. I show that Calvinists have perverted the word use and have manipulated current theological thinking by the manipulation.

Posted in Open Theism, Theology, videos | Tagged , | 2 Comments

sins versus crimes – the woman caught in adultery

In this video I explain that Jesus did not teach the abolition of the Death Penalty. He, instead, held up the Mosaic law.

Posted in Theology, Theonomy, videos | Tagged | 1 Comment

people are not robots

CNN reports that almost 1 in 10 iPhone owners have “Jailbroke” their phones. “Jailbreaking” is the process of overriding the security settings to allow programs of the user’s choice to be placed on the device. This process might destroy the iPhone and void the warranty. Normal operations can be impaired, but oddly, in spite of this, 1 in 10 iPhone users have researched complicated and advanced hacking methods in order to decide they do not want some monolithic entity telling them what is best for them.

Human beings naturally love freedom; they love to innovate and create. They want to be free to act and think how they wish. When parameters are set on them, such as in a school setting, they naturally rebel. Instead, sites like YouTube and DeviantArt are prospering in the current age in which individuality is championed and new frontiers are constantly created.

Sadly, the innovators want to kill the golden goose that made them rich. Like a child crushing to death the pet they love, they increasingly vote for socialism, a socialism which finds ever growing excuses to limit and destroy innovation and creativity. Health care becomes government financed so the government feels it can then tell people how to eat, when to wear seatbelts, and what they can do in their free time. The rules compound with an ever growing chain of interlinked excuses to dictate people’s free actions. It will never stop until the government has their nation of perfect automatons living, acting and breathing in a predefined and prearranged manner. When the government controls something, they will strive to control everything.

The statists do not want innovation, they do not want creativity; they want the status quo. Old careers are to be held indefinitely. If the American agricultural sector was once 90% of the workforce, that was to be held from generation to generation forever. But people rebel: they create and innovate. Suddenly new technology careers spring from nothing and people flock from back breaking labor into wages for their imaginative thought alone. The government is at first shocked. Then it regains its balance and tries to wave its heavy hand over the new industries. They burden them with paperwork and laws, crushing newcomers and holding under their thumb anyone who has created something beautiful.

It is sickening: people voting for socialism. It is the death of creativity. It is the death of freedom. It was scaling back on government burdens that gave us Amazon.com and Ebay. It was to by-pass government that we have streaming media and Podcasts. It was in spite of government that we have an ever increasing access to information, and a network of providers of artistic compositions. The only thing we have to fear is ourselves, and we are the government.

Posted in Human Nature | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

on burning books

It is odd that burning a Koran has gained so much national attention. If I were to burn The Little Red Book no one would care or show up, except maybe a few hippies (nothing that a couple bottles of soap could not handle). But if I were to burn the Koran, pure pandemonium would ensue. Beheadings, bombings, and riots in the streets would be commonplace.

There is nothing inherently wrong with burning processed wood, aka books, although sometimes burning books is less than ideal. When the orthodox Christians sought to erase Gnostic and anti-Christian thought they tragically burned most of those works out of existence. Both historical and theological memories were erased forever from the collective memories of humankind. When the Nazis sought to burn books, their goal was to limit their people’s access to those books. In these cases, it is not burning the book that is wrong but the motivation behind it.

Burning the Koran is a little different of a story: the Koran will still be universally available and the burning would more likely increase Koran book sales than decrease it.

I happen to own a Koran and the first thing I noticed is how disjointed and incoherent it is. If it were not so fervently protected by Muslims, I know of a few English teachers who might burn it for just readability alone. The content is another thing. This is a book written by one man who claims he had visions, engaged in a bunch of violence, and had all sorts of wives (David Koresh, anyone?). This does not seem like a very solid foundation for a religion to me. When you couple that fact with the widespread acceptance in Islam of the fanatics who blow minor insults out of proportion and kill people, one is left with the feeling that Islam is a very dangerous delusion.

The burning the Koran is more of a symbolic act meant to say that the god of Islam is false and that the Religion of Peace is not so peaceful. The Islamists might blow it out of proportion and kill people, but those burning the Koran are not culpable for those deaths. After all, rapes victims who dress provocatively are not culpable for their own rapes.

On a side note: I wonder how Muslims would react to people deleting a digital copy of the Koran?

Posted in Morality | Tagged , | Leave a comment

on burning Korans

joker burn Korans

If the Joker wanted to really shake up society, he did not have to go through elaborate plans of planting multiple bombs and handing out detonators. He did not have to burn piles of money or kill politicians. All he needed to do was burn a couple of Korans and the Religion of Peace would be sure to engage in general lawlessness and chaos. Even the politicians would go crazy with rage.

Maybe the Joker was scared of being beheaded? After all, Batman doesn’t behead people.

Posted in Human Nature | Tagged , | Leave a comment