what is a lie

Posted on November 24, 2010 by christopher fisher

A lie is quite literally a statement with intent to deceive. If the time were 3:30PM and someone, knowing the actual time, claimed it was 4:30PM in an effort to deceive someone, this would be a lie. In this case not only is the subject matter false, but also the actor is proclaiming something the actor does not believe in order to make someone else believe what the actor himself does not believe.

This is different then a jest. If the actor does not want the other person to believe him, but to understand he is joking, this is not a lie. When asked the time, the actor might proclaim it was 127:40 in an effort to amuse and not deceive. In this case, the actor is positing a statement with the knowledge that the sentence is obviously false. No intent to deceive is present. If jesting is lying, then too would acting be. Actors pretend day in and day out to be other people, professing things they do not believe. The audience understands that the actor is projecting and is not to be taken literally. It is not a lie to recite a play.

Additionally, someone can actually lie when they are telling the truth. If the time was 3:30PM but the actor’s watch was off and the actor believed it to be 2:30PM but then said the time was 3:30PM in an effort to make another person believe something the actor did not believe, then this would be a lie.

Lying is all about intent. Where there is no intent, there is no lie. A lie is a statement with intent to deceive.

Posted in Morality | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

when is a lie not a sin

Posted on November 24, 2010 by christopher fisher

Today I received a text message on my phone concerning a child’s toy that I had posted for sale on Craigslist. The text asked me if it was still for sale. A few text messages later the sender began asking for my name, my wife’s name, my children’s ages, etc. I promptly told them the item was sold, and after the sender persisted I informed the sender that the conversation was over.

From now on, when posting items in the kids section of craigslist I will accompany the post with a lie:

My wife just divorced me, took the children, and now I am selling what toys I have left.

This is a definite lie. It is not even just a lie to a potential child molester, it is a lie to everyone who reads it. Is this immoral? Is it immoral to preemptively lie to give your children more security. No one except the most brainwashed Christian will say “yes”.

Lies are endorsed in the Bible. Not every lie, but lying under certain circumstances. God lies consistently to his enemies. He sends deceiving spirits. He uses deception in battle. He blesses those who lie to save the innocent. He crafts half-lies (1Sa 16:2 And Samuel said, How can I go? if Saul hear it, he will kill me. And the LORD said, Take an heifer with thee, and say, I am come to sacrifice to the LORD.). Again, Skeptics Annotated Bible (SAB) illustrates this beautifully.

What SAB fails to understand concerning lies, is that it is wrong to lie to your friends but it is blessed by God to lie to those wishing to hurt the innocent. Often the Bible passages concerning lies are very explicit about lying b

Exo 20:16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. [SAB conveniently leaves off the second half of this verse]

Lev 6:2 If a soul sin, and commit a trespass against the LORD, and lie unto his neighbour in that which was delivered him to keep, or in fellowship, or in a thing taken away by violence, or hath deceived his neighbour;

Lev 19:11 Ye shall not steal, neither deal falsely, neither lie one to another.

Eph 4:25 Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbor: for we are members one of another.

Other times they are implied:

Exo 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.

Exo 23:7 Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked.

Of the times lying is flat out condemned, it is actually a rule of thumb, describing someone characterized by the sin, or using a figure of speech. If someone lies consistently to save the lives of others, such as Corrie ten Boom, they are not known as a liar, just as a soldier who kills the enemy consistently is not a murderer. Someone who lies to their friends, who lies for personal profit, such as the politician, that person is a liar just as someone who kills the innocent is a murderer. Sins define the sinner. Where there is no sin there is no sinner.

If one believes the Bible. If one believes that God does not sin. Then lying cannot possibly be always a sin. It is not wrong to lie to God’s enemies. It is not wrong to lie to those wishing to hurt you. It is wrong to lie to your neighbor.

Posted in Morality, Theology | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

copyright thugs strike GTA

Posted on November 22, 2010 by christopher fisher

Grand Theft Auto, a game made famous for beating to death hookers and running over old people with tanks, has just been banned by a Brazillian judge. The reason: an 8 year old was sampled in one featured song and was used without the permission of the boy’s father:

Despite being on iTunes in instrumental and remix forms, ‘Kid Conga’ allegedly makes use of an unauthorised sample from another song, ‘Bota o Dedinho pro Alto’, written by Brazilian composer Hamilton Lourenço da Silva, father of MC Miltinho…
The Brazilian court has ruled that Rockstar is therefore “restricted from trading and distributing the expansion Episodes From Liberty City”, and wants copies pulled from shelves worldwide. It also wants digital versions pulled, with the threat of a R$5,000 (around £1900) fine for each day that the game remains on sale.

So, a game that took millions of dollars to develop, has global distribution, and has had millions of intellectual inputs from a vast array of source, now should be shelved for sampling a clip from an obscure child which can be freely heard on YouTube. This shows the vast thuggery of Copyright law.

To make a million dollar game, movie, or any other wide scoped project, one will always violate some sort of copyright. Art works by building on the ideas of others. There is no possible way to do otherwise. But copyright laws are not about creation, they are about stagnation and government control.

Posted in Goverment, Human Nature | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

a new Social Contract

Posted on November 18, 2010 by christopher fisher

The idea of a “Social Contract” is often tossed around by people in the media or in education. One might hear it cited by a teacher advocating democracy and attempting to be clever. They will say that by living in a society we are signing a contract to live by its laws. The Social Contract can be summed up as such:

The heart of the idea of the social contract may be stated simply: Each of us places his person and authority under the supreme direction of the general will: and the group receives each individual as an indivisible part of the whole –Rousseau

I, for one, have never signed any contract to this extent and neither has most Americans. Primarily, people have come to live under the rule of the American government by means of birth. Of course, if people are unhappy with majority rule, as majority rule often leads to the oppression of the minority (Fundamentalist Christians, homeschoolers, smokers, non-seatbelt wearers, business owners, etc), they are left with little viable choices for freer countries. Aside from a huge exit cost (monetary, family relationships, logistics, language, etc) the freedom seeker will be unable to find a country with more freedom and similar demographical areas as the United States.

The Economic Freedom index lists the more economically free countries as: Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Switzerland, and Canada. Of these nations, not one scores better in regards to inherent personal freedoms (such as the right to bear arms). As such, a freedom lover would have to literally seastead in order to find a freer country than the United States.

This leaves the citizen of the United States in a precarious position, one of living under an unjust system. As such, a new Social Contract is needed. A better Social Contract would be stated as such:

Each of us places his person and authority under the supreme direction of the God’s will. Each individual will live as he wishes otherwise with an understanding that laws are only laws if caught and the penalties (if any) are the fees for that action. These fees may include countless hours in court and harassment by police, as well as a small chance of legal punishment.

Now that is a social contract I can sign.

Posted in Goverment, Human Nature | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Calvinism defeated in two verses

Posted on November 10, 2010 by christopher fisher

One of the key tenents of Calvinism is that God controls all things. Calvinists redefine “sovreign” or “almighty” to mean this and then claim the Bible backs their assertion. Contrary to this, the Bible teaches God is not the author of all things:

Jas 1:13 Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man:

What would be a Calvinist’s response to this? Well, I have asked a few in the past. Their response tends to be “no one is tempted with evil.” This is interesting because the very next verse says otherwise:

Jas 1:14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.

The Calvinists are at a dilemma. Either they need now to explain away the plain reading of these two verses (ex. “ummm… God works through proxy so although he is the source it is not him tempting”), endorse an illogical view (“although God is the puppet-master, he is not responsible”) or reject Calvinism. Chances that a Calvinist would reject their Platonism: slim to none. When you are living high in a popular cult, you tend to ignore reality.

Posted in Open Theism, Theology | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

top 10 reasons Rambo should be the movie of the year

Posted on November 9, 2010 by christopher fisher

I just happened across one of my old TheologyOnline posts from 2008:

Usually any movie featuring Sylvester Stallone has a special place in my heart, that is in the bargain bin part of it. But once in a while, an aging, hideous, monster of a man might actually make a good movie. Do not be deceived by the cover of this movie (Rambo looking out at the audience with lust and a hint of desperation). Sometime it is on the inside that which counts. I strongly feel Rambo should win the title of best movie of the year for the following reasons:

1.The Christians are the good guys.
2.The movie depicts the Christians as humanitarians.
3.The Pacifist Christian learns that it is not always wrong to kill bad guys, sometimes even by repeatedly applying a rock to their skulls.
4.It shows how naïve some do-gooders are.
5.It depicts the horrors of other nations (America haters, take that).
6.Rambo systematically kills 5 soldiers about to execute women and children (a very joyful moment).
7.There is a cool-beans sniper and he doesn’t die.
8.Unlike retarded movies, just because someone is portrayed in a negative light in the beginning does not mean they die later.
9.Rambo disembowels the evil, murdering, child molesting leader of the enemy (although the death was too quick for my preference).
10.It has the “We were Soldiers” feel of the outnumbered good guys totally annihilating the enemy through massive firepower.

There are a couple of reasons liberals can love it too.

1.The mercenary force seemed to be multi-national coalition force.
2.The (literal) pigs who killed one Christian were never brought to justice.
3.There are scenes of Christians being murdered en masse.
4.The Christian missionaries are mostly all killed.
5.The socialist government of Burma has left the 55 million inhabitants impoverished so there is lots of trees and no industry (close your eyes in the scenes where some trees die).

Posted in Humor, Vanity | Leave a comment

95 Open Theism verses

Posted on November 9, 2010 by christopher fisher

This is worth reproducing in whole. From ApologeticJedi from TheologyOnline:

1. God worked in six day-divided time spans, but rested on the seventh day (Gen 2:1-2)
2. God brought the animals before Adam to see what he would call them. (Gen 2:19)
3. God is uncertain whether they will eat of the Tree of Life after the fall. (Gen 3:22)
4. God repents that he made man. (Gen 6:6)
5. God must patiently wait while the ark is being built (1 Pet 3:20)
6. Satan is willing to wager with God over how the future will turn out. (Job 1:11-12)
7. Abraham challenges God over his promise, and lives! (Gen 15:2-3, 6)
8. God is prevailed upon by Abraham over whether to spare Sodom. (Gen 18:23-33)
9. The angels of God argue with Lot about sleeping in the square (Gen 19:2-4)
10. God learns that Abraham would go to not withhold even his son (Gen 22:12)
11. God is moved by the cries of injustice (Ex. 2:23-25)
12. God agrees with Moses that a backup plan should be prepared. (Ex. 4:1-9)
13. God promised those in the Exodus would reach the promise land, but they don’t. (Deut. 1:8; 1:34)
14. God is uncertain how Israel will react when they see war. (Ex 13:17)
15. God tells Moses He will destroy Israel, but does not. (Ex 32:7-10; Deut 10:10)
16. God tells Moses He will not lead them, but He does (Ex. 33:3-19)
17. God wants to destroy Israel again, but is talked out of it (Num 14:11-12)
18. God sets both a curse and a blessing for Israel to choose. (Deut. 11:26-28)
19. God has faith in the people, that they can do it. (Deut 30:11)
20. God gives the choice of life and death. (Deut. 30:19)
21. God repents when his sets up people that lead others astray. (Deut. 32:36)
22. God promises to drive out the Canaanites, but doesn’t (Josh 3:10; Judg 2:1-3; 3:1-7)
23. Joshua charges that we can choose between good and evil. (Joshua 24:15)
24. God changes His mind about establishing Eli and his sons forever. (1 Sam 2:30)
25. God gives Israel a king before He had planned to. (1 Sam 7:7-8)
26. God had planned to establish Saul forever, but will not. (1 Sam 13:13-14)
27. God repents over making Saul king. (1 Sam 15:10)
28. David believes God can change His mind. (2 Sam 12:21-23)
29. God’s mercy stopped the punishment from completing what He said. (2 Sam 24:16; 2 Chr 21:15)
30. Elijah claims they had two options to choose from. (1 Kings 18:21)
31. God is not always in the wind, fire, and earthquakes. (1 Kings 19:12)
32. God is full of compassion. (Ps 78:38-40)
33. God is limited by man’s decisions (Ps 78:41)
34. God desires new songs (Ps 33:3; 96:1; 98:1; 144:9; 149:1).
35. Heed my rebuke demands God, or else (Prov 1:22-27).
36. The span of your life is alterable (Prov. 9:11)
37. Solomon lists chance as a factor in life. (Ecc 9:11)
38. God tells Hezekiah that he will die, then adds years to his life. (2 Kings 20:1-6)
39. God expected His work towards Israel would not be in vain. (Isa 5:1-5)
40. God’s desire is to be allowed to forget our sins. (Isa 43:25).
41. God declares the future, rather than knowing it. (Isa 46:9-11)
42. It is not God that keeps men from being saved. (Isa 59:1)
43. The people were able to grieve the Holy Spirit. (Isa. 63:10)
44. God predicted Israel would repent, but admits He was wrong. (Jer 3:7-10)
45. Ordaining the sacrificing of children never entered God’s mind (Jer 7:31; 19:5; 32:35)
46. God gets tired of repenting. (Jer 15:6)
47. God promises to repent of what He thought to destroy a repenting people. (Jer 18:7-8)
48. God promises to repent of what He says to promote a backslidden people. (Jer 18:9-10)
49. God is uncertain if the people will repent if they hear his message. (Jer 26:2-3)
50. God is uncertain if the people will repent from a written message. (Jer 36:2-3)
51. God does not willingly bring grief on men. (Lam 3:33)
52. God despises the fatalistic viewpoint. (Eze 18:2)
53. God predicts Babylon will take Tyre, but they do not. (Eze 26:7; 29:18)
54. God predicts Babylon will destroy Egypt, but they do not (Eze 30:10)
55. What God wants, is for the wicked to turn from their ways. (Eze 33:11)
56. God becomes heartbroken. (Hosea 11:8-9)
57. God sends a drought to influence his people without success (Amos 4:6-11)
58. Nineveh repents and God refuses to fulfill His prophecy. (Jonah 3:10)
59. Jesus became flesh, who had never been so previously. (John 1:14)
60. The will of men and the will of God need to coincide. (John 7:17)
61. Some people are just born blind. (John 9:1-4)
62. Man has a choice, and God wants him to choose to abide in Him. (John 15:6-7)
63. Jesus is amazed at the unbelief of Israel. (Mark 6:6)
64. Jesus is marveled at the belief of Gentiles (Luke 7:9)
65. The Pharisees and lawyers rejected the will of God. (Luke 7:30)
66. They could have believed if Satan hadn’t interfered. (Luke 8:12)
67. Jesus teaches about chance meetings. (Luke 10:31)
68. Bad things happen without a reason. (Luke 13:2-5)
69. God wants to destroy Israel, but Jesus convinces God to wait-and-see. (Luke 13:6-9)
70. Woe! Men are responsible for their own actions. (Luke 17:1)
71. Perhaps they will respect the master’s son, says the master. (Luke 20:13)
72. Jesus asks people to come to him. (Matt 11:28).
73. Jesus predicts the last days will not last as long as prophesied. (Matt 24:22)
74. Jesus predicts he will return in His follower’s lifetime. (Mat 24:33-34; 16:28; 10:23; 23:31-36)
75. Jesus says he wanted Israel to rally to him, but they weren’t willing. (Mat 23:37)
76. Jesus left Godliness to become sin and to experience death, for us. (Phil 2:8; Heb 12:12-20)
77. The Father, for the first time, forsakes the Son. (Mat 27:46)
78. The Holy Spirit announces the start of the Last Days that never come. (Acts 2:14-20)
79. People can resist the Holy Spirit in their lives (Acts 7:51)
80. Paul advises to prevent prophecy from happening. (Acts 13:40-41; Hab 1:5)
81. Faith comes from things that men do – namely hearing and reading. (Rom 10:17)
82. God may return to Israel if the Gentiles abuse their position. (Rom 11:20-24)
83. Love is more important to God than a prophecy. (1 Cor 13:1-13)
84. Your prize is not decreed, but is based on how you run. (1 Cor . 9:24)
85. God changes His mind about keeping the Sabbaths. (Col 2:16)
86. God wants all to be saved. (1 Tim. 2:3)
87. God’s will is that men abstain from sexual immorality. (1 Thess 4:3)
88. Jesus must wait for his enemies to become His footstool. (Heb 10:12-13)
89. God does not pick one person over another (Gal 2:6)
90. If you do these things, your election will be made sure. (2 Peter 1:10)
91. The Holy Spirit counsels everyone to decide to come to Christ. (2 Peter 3:9)
92. Temptation originates apart from God’s decree but from our own will. (James 1:13-15)
93. God very strongly desires that we follow Him and not the world. (James4:5)
94. There is time in heaven. (Rev. 8:1; 6:10; 22:2)
95. The water of life is offered to whoever wills. (Rev 22:17)

Posted in Open Theism, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Christian cliches – is it a sin to drink wine

Posted on November 8, 2010 by christopher fisher

Recently I heard Pastor Anderson speak very harshly about alcohol. His claim was that it is a sin to drink anything alcoholic. Any time the Bible shows any righteous person drinking or any time the Bible makes a positive statement about wine, it was talking about unfermented wine.

Of course this is complete rubbish. Wine starts fermenting the second it comes off the press, and the only way to stop fermentation is modern chemicals. But this nonsense persists in spite of physics.

Contrary to what Pastor Anderson claims, the Bible completely encourages certain forms and levels of intoxicating drink:

Pro 31:6 Give strong drink unto him that is ready to perish, and wine unto those that be of heavy hearts.
Pro 31:7 Let him drink, and forget his poverty, and remember his misery no more.

This proverb, a prophecy of God, makes no sense through the lens of Anderson. How would drinking grape juice make someone forget their worries, and if it was non-alcoholic, why would the previous verse say for princes not to partake in it? This is definitely alcoholic wine, wine which is recommended by God to be used as an anti-depressant.

Likewise, one of God’s curses/harms of rebellion from God is that Israel’s wine is diluted:

Isa 1:21 How is the faithful city become an harlot! it was full of judgment; righteousness lodged in it; but now murderers.
Isa 1:22 Thy silver is become dross, thy wine mixed with water:

Why would God mention grape juice being diluted? And if wine is sinful, why is God listing it as a curse. This would be the equivalent to God saying drug users can no longer shoot drugs into their arm if their arm is cut off due to drug use. It makes no sense.

Furthermore, one of God’s qualifications to become a leader in the church is that the men in question do not drink too much wine:

1Ti 3:8 Likewise must the deacons be grave, not doubletongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre;

If this wine is not alcoholic, why would God not just condemn gluttony? If this is alcoholic wine, why would God not condemn any drinking of wine? It is readily apparent that church leaders can partake in some wine.

The real clincher is not that Paul recommends Timothy to drink some wine for health reasons (1Ti 5:23), but Christ made “good” wine for his very first miracle:

Joh 2:9 When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom,
Joh 2:10 And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now.

Notice that the men are well drunk by the time the inferior wine comes out. The good wine was the more alcoholic wine, something confirmed by even modern standard. It was the alcoholic wine that Jesus made. Jesus made “good” wine.

Wine is not sinful. As Jesus said:

“Mat 15:11 Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.”

Alcohol is not a sin, but being a drunkard is a sin. All the quotes in the Bible concerning alcohol and sinning deals with drunkenness, not the rare drunken night or drinking to drown sorrow, but the wanton gluttony that characterized drunkards.

Posted in Christian Cliches, Morality, Theology | 1 Comment

Eagle Forum opposes personhood

Posted on November 6, 2010 by christopher fisher

As posted on www.eagleforum.org:

The “personhood” initiative lost by a landslide of 73% to 27% in Colorado in 2008, and its unpopular coattails hurt good pro-life candidates there. This poorly designed initiative would not prevent a single abortion even it if became law, and its vague language would enable more mischief by judges.

The latest election in Colorado showed the number of voters voting for personhood to have now increased to 30%. The issue of abortion is not about health, it is not about rape, it is not about choice. The issue of abortion is about if that unborn baby is a human being. So why not vote on that? Why not have that debate with opponents?

How will they respond? When is it right to murder innocent human beings? If the baby is known to be that innocent human being (an easy thing to show), all those other side points do not seem as relevant any more. When the debate is focused on choice, health, or any other nonsense, those wanting to protect the unborn will always lose. When the debate is focused on the heart of the issue, the dying child, pro-lifers have the truth on their side.

So why do popular right wing organizations (National Right to Life, the Eagle Forum, Americans United for Life, etc) oppose personhood? It is because they care more about man’s opinions than God’s. They are willing that millions of innocent babies die so they do not lose face with mainstream America, so that they do not lose donations in the now.

It will not be until organizations who follow God and do not compromise on murder, it will not be until they make personhood mainstream that the pretenders will jump on board.

Posted in Human Nature, Morality | Tagged | Leave a comment

the sin of voting Republican

Posted on November 4, 2010 by christopher fisher

Today I wrote a letter to a husband of a coworker after a dispute concerning the morality of voting for politicians who compromise on “thou shalt not murder”. The following is what I wrote:

Sir,

I seem to have distressed your wife earlier today. I tried to explain to her the Christian maxim that we do not do evil that good may come. She then forwarded me your email address, I presume, to continue the discussion with you. I am under the impression that you are a Christian (believe in the life, death (as atonement for sin), and physical resurrection of God’s son), and that you are willing to heed the word of God from the Bible. So I will reach out to you because I care if you offend God, through ignorance (Num 15:28) or deliberately, and I suspect you do as well.

Rom 3:8 And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.

The apostle Paul says in Romans that those who “do evil that good make come” are worthy of condemnation (damnation). He is revolted at the very idea that some attribute that saying to him. It is wrong to do evil that good may come. For example, if terrorists held the world hostage with nuclear weapons, and they told me to rape a woman and they would spare the world, I would refuse. Of course, the world would then end, but not because of my evil. It would be because of the evil of others. There would not be blood on my hands. If I did rape that woman, then that is where the sin would be on me. It is as Jesus says:

Mat 16:26 For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?

Predicting the future is a hard task. Even the expert Economists struggle to predict one month in advance. We can never know what harms or evils might be brought into the world through our compromises. Maybe voting for politicians who compromise on murder will embolden them not to change? Maybe voting for these politicians will cause unbelievers to dismiss Christianity as hypocritical? Maybe voting for these politicians will lead Christians into compromising on more and more, decaying morality all the more?
While it is hard to predict the future, we can know for certain that never doing evil will always be the right thing.

When is it ok to kill an innocent child? Do we punish the child for the sins of the father (such as rape or incest)? If it is not ok to murder these children, then by what standard could we cast our vote, our voice in support, of those advocating such things? Would that not make us murderers by collaboration? By George W Bush’s own standard (rape and incest) more than 50 thousand babies were murdered under his watch. To put that in perspective, that is 760 school buses full of children (2 school buses per week). That is what Christians voted for.

Imagine in Nazi Germany that Hitler was running against Hitler-light. Hitler says “We should kill all Jews.” Hitler-light says “No, only old ones and some with mental disorders.” Would a Christian be just to vote for Hitler-light? Let me restate this. Assume you live in America and Obama is running against McCain. Obama says “we should be able to kill babies for any reason whatsoever.” McCain says “instead of all the children, we should only kill the children of the [name of letter recipient].” Would you vote for McCain? Would it be a sin? If no on the first question, do you not see the hypocrisy and evilness in allowing your neighbor’s children to die, but opposing your own children’s death in the name of compromise?

Jesus also said this:

Mat 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Mat 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
Mat 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

The Republicans, by and large, are these false prophets. I worked for many years helping the Republicans in their agenda. I went door to door for them. Registered voters for them. I even reached the semi-upper echelon of their group. By and large, they only care for power and will do anything for it. They will lie and lie again for votes, and it seems Christians are just gullible enough to oblige them. When I talked to the most “conservative” Judge on the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas, I asked him about abortion (the murder of unborn children), he avoided the question and refused to answer. This man is appointed for life, and even he will not take a stand! It is sickening.

What Republican judge will say that the unborn baby has the right to life? None. What Republican politician would say it? Almost none!

Jesus says you will know them by their fruit. The Republicans fruit is 40 years of legalize abortion for any reason at any time. It is time to stop compromising.

George W Bush profile.

Thank you for you time,

Christopher Fisher

Posted in Goverment, Morality, Theology | Leave a comment