the rapture in matthew 24

I stumbled across an excellent blog today. One of the better articles was on how modern Christians misinterpret Matthew 24 to mean the exact opposite of what it means. The text in context:

Mat 24:37 But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Mat 24:38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,
Mat 24:39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Mat 24:40 Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
Mat 24:41 Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

Now Christians tend to say that this “one shall be taken” is a supernatural teleportation to be with Jesus. Post-tribulation advocates seem to just grant them this point without argument, but the text does not support that interpretation.

See verse 39. Who is the “they”? Where are “they” being taken? From verse 38, we see the “they” refers to the wicked. Obviously, “they” were drowned to death and perished. The following verses talk more about a coming apocalypse than a rapture.

Two women are standing at a mill, one is killed and one is spared. Two men are in a field, one is killed and one is spared.

This also ties in nicely to the subsequent verses. Watch. Don’t eat and drink like those who perished. If you do well, you will be given gifts. If you do bad, you will be punished. This fits Jesus’ gospel of a coming earthly Kingdom of God.

Posted in Dispensationalism, Theology | Leave a comment

Christian cliches – all sins are equal

If trying to disprove an all-encompassing statement, there are multiple ways to go about this. One: a contrary rule can be show to be true. Two: a specific contrary example can be given. Three: a contrary fact can be shown.

When Christians claim that “all sins are equal”, they are declaring a all-encompassing statement that is not found in the Bible. They usually mean by saying this that a sin is a sin. Stealing a pack of gum is the same level of sin as killing a baby. This is not a doctrine found in the Bible. Luckily the Bible contradicts this statement using all methods discussed above.

Jesus indicated that there were different levels of sins. Jesus said to Pilate that those who delivered Jesus to Pilate had the greater sin:

Joh 19:10 Then saith Pilate unto him, Speakest thou not unto me? knowest thou not that I have power to crucify thee, and have power to release thee?
Joh 19:11 Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.

Jesus is saying because government power is delegated to Caesar through the government and delegated to Pilot, the people who are acting under their own powers are more guilty. They have the greater sin. Elsewhere Jesus says:

Luk 12:47 And that servant, which knew his lord’s will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes.
Luk 12:48 But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more.

To whom much has be given (in knowledge), the greater his judgement. This is also consistent with the teachings of James:

Jas 3:1 My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation.

Masters here means “teachers”. The more you know the more you will be judged by a stricter standard. If a child steals a pack of gum, it is not the same as a police officer stealing a pack of gum.

Again showing not all sins are equal, Jesus also stated there was a special sin known as the unpardonable sin:

Mat 12:31 Wherefore I [Jesus] say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.

Jesus here is distinguishing between most sins and a special sin. Everything can be forgiven except one. If all sins were equal, there could be no such thing as an unpardonable sin. They would either be all pardonable or all unpardonable.

So Jesus lays of a general rule, that people are judged unequally based on what they have been given. Jesus then cites a specific example, the Jews who handed Jesus over to Pilate having the greater sin. He then explains a specific sin treated differently then all the others, the unpardonable sin. Did Jesus think all sins were equal? It is obvious he did not, so then where do people get this idea?

Jesus in his sermon on the mount talks about “thinking a sin” and “doing a sin”. He covers several sins including murder and adultery:

Mat 5:22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

Mat 5:27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
Mat 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

So is Jesus saying that all sins are equal or that all sins lead to hell? These are different concepts. As we have shown earlier, some will be judged with many stripes and some with few. Lusting after a woman in your heart, while it is adultery, is less of a sin then actually committing it. Calling your brother fool, is different than murder. Though all sins lead to separation from God, not all sins are equal.

Posted in Bible, Christian Cliches, Morality, Theology | Leave a comment

ancient swearing

Some Christians point to the fact that the entire world takes God’s name in vain as evidence that he is the true God. This does not seem a compelling argument to me; swearing by the dominant gods’ names is a tradition that pre-dates the spread of Christianity. In the past, “by Castor”, “by Hercules”, and the sometime still heard “by Jove” (Jove is Jupiter, which is the Roman name for Zeus) were common. Almost all gods of the Greeks and Romans could be used for a swear word. Gellius (c. 125-180 AD) states:

6 That at Rome women did not swear by Hercules nor men by Castor.

1 In our early writings neither do Roman women swear by Hercules nor the men by Castor. 2 But why the women did not swear by Hercules is evident, since they abstain from sacrificing to Hercules. 3 On the other hand, why the men did not name Castor in oaths is not easy to say. Nowhere, then, is it possible to find an instance, among good writers, either of a woman saying “by Hercules” or a man, “by Castor”; 4 but edepol, which is an oath by Pollux, is common to both man and woman. 5 Marcus Varro, however, asserts that the earliest men were wont to swear neither by Castor nor by Pollux, but that this oath was used by women alone and was taken from the Eleusinian initiations; 6 that gradually, however, through ignorance of ancient usage, men began to say edepol, and thus it became a customary expression; but that the use of “by Castor” by a man appears in no ancient writing.

Throughout ancient writings we see much of this. For example, in The Banquet of the Learned by Athenaeus we the actual text of swearing by the names of their gods. Athenaeus quotes many other authors, so presents a broad sample:

Theophilus says, in his Pancratiast–

_B._ A noble dish, by Hercules!

And:

And Menander, in his Demiurgus, says–

_A._ What now is this, my boy, for you, by Jove,
Have come in a most business-like set fashion.

The ancient world swore at the dominate gods just as today people swear using God’s name.

Posted in History | Leave a comment

jewish proselytization and proselytes

As discussed before, in the beginning of Paul’s ministry he gained eager converts from Gentiles who were in the synagogue. These individuals were known as God-fearers, those who were attracted to Judaism but had not converted fully. This was highly fertile ground for fledgling Christianity. Contrary to modern Judaism, ancient Judaism seems to have attracted many converts and potential converts from the Gentile population.

Pagan histories of the time record the disdain that was felt because of Jewish proselytization (whither it was active or passive proselytization). Cassius Dio records:

They have also another name that has been acquired,–i.e., the country has been called Judaea, and the people themselves Jews. I do not know from what source this title was first given them, but it applies also to all the rest of mankind, although of foreign race, who cherish their customs.

It was well known to Cassius that people could convert to Judaism. It was a big enough phenomena he specifically mentions the occurrence. Later on he writes:

As there had been a large influx of Jews into Rome and they were converting many of the native inhabitants to their principles he expelled the great majority of them.

This was the expulsion in 19 AD (under Tiberius), not to be confused with the expulsion in 49 AD (under Claudius). In reference to the 49 AD event (some argue that Cassius is saying no expulsion happened), Cassius writes:

In the matter of the Jews, who had again increased so greatly that by reason of their multitude it would have been hard without raising a tumult to bar them from the City, he decided not to drive them out, but ordered them to follow that mode of life prescribed by their ancestral custom and not to assemble in numbers.

Both these passages from Claudius indicate a large Jewish conversion. Judaism was a metropolitan religion, appealing to many Gentiles. The Jews, in that day, welcomed all comers who could follow their customs, and the Jews would integrate those individuals into their community. The Jews had such great influence that even Rome conformed its laws to match Jewish law instead of vice versa. Augustine records Seneca in City of God:

When he was speaking concerning those Jews, he said, When, meanwhile, the customs of that most accursed nation have gained such strength that they have been now received in all lands, the conquered have given laws to the conquerors.

The Bible records the same picture. Luke, throughout Acts, gives us glancing references to this phenomenon:

Act 10:1 There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of the band called the Italian band,
Act 10:2 A devout man, and one that feared God with all his house, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed to God alway.

The first Gentile to be grafted into Jewish communion without kosher food laws or circumcision was a God-fearing Centurion. This is also interesting because the Romans exempted the Jews from military service, as the Jews practiced no work on the Sabbath. This was mind boggling to Peter.

Later, after the conversion of Paul, the reader again meets God-fearing Gentiles:

Act 13:14 But when they departed from Perga, they came to Antioch in Pisidia, and went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and sat down.

Act 13:16 Then Paul stood up, and beckoning with his hand said, Men of Israel, and ye that fear God, give audience.

Israel and those that fear God are two separate groups. This is made clear when after Paul stops speaking. The Jews exit the synagogue and the Gentiles ask Paul to preach more:

Act 13:42 And when the Jews were gone out of the synagogue, the Gentiles besought that these words might be preached to them the next sabbath.

Act 13:44 And the next sabbath day came almost the whole city together to hear the word of God.
Act 13:45 But when the Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with envy, and spake against those things which were spoken by Paul, contradicting and blaspheming.

Notice that the Jews become envious. Perhaps they were used to being the main draw for converts and now an upstart preaching a new gospel gains a bigger audience then they ever could. The Jews proceed to drive him out just after Paul explains his mission to the Gentiles.

In Iconium, the reader again meets more God-fearing Gentiles:

Act 14:1 And it came to pass in Iconium, that they went both together into the synagogue of the Jews, and so spake, that a great multitude both of the Jews and also of the Greeks believed.

Paul’s primary teaching point is the synagogue. Sometimes he preaches elsewhere, when he is driven out of the synagogue or there is no synagogue. But the Gentiles primarily hear his preaching inside the synagogue.

The next God fearer that is listed in Acts is another individual, Lydia. Lydia might not be her real name but instead a name derived from the place she was from. In any case, she seems to be a Gentile in a city without a synagogue (Philippi). Lydia had worshiped God before Paul. But because of Paul “her heart was opened”:

Act 16:14 And a certain woman named Lydia, a seller of purple, of the city of Thyatira, which worshipped God, heard us: whose heart the Lord opened, that she attended unto the things which were spoken of Paul.

In Thessalonica Paul again enters a synagogue and converts Gentiles:

Act 17:1 Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where was a synagogue of the Jews:

Act 17:4 And some of them believed, and consorted with Paul and Silas; and of the devout Greeks a great multitude, and of the chief women not a few.

In Athens, Luke seems to specify three groups of people: Jews in the synagogue, Gentiles in the synagogue and random people in the market. Notice the location change as only applied to the third category:

Act 17:17 Therefore disputed he in the synagogue with the Jews, and with the devout persons, and in the market daily with them that met with him.

Paul then goes to Corinth and again preaches to Gentiles in the synagogue:

Act 18:4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.

After he is rejected (this is directly after preaching to the Jews and Greeks), he walks next door to a God-fearing Gentile:

Act 18:5 And when Silas and Timotheus were come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the spirit, and testified to the Jews that Jesus was Christ.
Act 18:6 And when they opposed themselves, and blasphemed, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean: from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles.
Act 18:7 And he departed thence, and entered into a certain man’s house, named Justus, one that worshipped God, whose house joined hard to the synagogue.

Most of the references to God-fearing Gentiles throughout the Bible are indirect references. It was well known to the original readers of the New Testament that there was a God-fearer movement, so much so that it is addressed only in passing. Luke did not need to explain to his reader what God-fearers were, everyone was already familiar with them.

In summary, early Judaism had already gained a large following from the Gentiles by the time Paul showed up on the scene, with both converts and God-fearers. The pagan historians described this massive conversion, and there is ample evidence in Acts of this fact. Paul leveraged this receptive audience to his advantage. The God-fearers is where most of Paul’s success was found. This gives the context to Paul’s statement in Romans:

Rom 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:

They are not all Israel which are of Israel, many of them were once Gentiles.

Posted in Bible, Dispensationalism, History, Theology | 3 Comments

the police will protect you possibly

From the UK riots of 2011:

There were a lot of them. We came out of our shops but the police asked us to do nothing. But the police did not do anything so, as more came, we chased them off ourselves.” The staff from a local kebab restaurant ran at the attackers, doner knives in their hands. “I don’t think they will be coming back,” Karagoz said.

From the Los Angeles riots of 1992:

“I want to make it clear that we didn’t open fire first,” said David Joo, manager of the gun shop. “At that time, four police cars were there. Somebody started to shoot at us. The L.A.P.D. ran away in half a second. I never saw such a fast escape. I was pretty disappointed.” ‘Please Call Ambulance'”

Remember, the police have no legal responsibility to protect you.

Posted in Goverment | Leave a comment

leftists use guns to curb state corruption

From the Huffington Post:

In Oakland, California Panthers would patrol the streets at night with legally owned shotguns and law books. Police brutality and false arrests dropped dramatically. The response of the State Legislature was to change the gun laws so that Black Panthers could no longer do armed patrols. The Panther’s response was to interrupt the hearings with guns and proclamations in hand. Bobby Seale, co founder of the Panthers told the press that black people had a constitutional right to bear arms to defend themselves.

This is from former Black Panther member Jamal Joseph.

Posted in Goverment, Guns, Leftists | Leave a comment

why was paul persecuted and by whom

Gal 5:11 And I, brethren, if I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet suffer persecution? then is the offence of the cross ceased.

Paul, in his earliest known letter, describes exactly why he is persecuted. He claims it is because he does not preach “circumcision”. Circumcision, itself, is a strange and obscure Jewish tradition that stretched back to the time of Moses. It was an action in which the foreskin was removed from newborn boys on the 8th day after they had been born. But the term meant more than that to Paul. Paul, throughout his letters, equates circumcision as the law and uses the terms interchangeably. Paul’s persecutions were primarily because he taught grace without the law.

Modern Christianity likes to paint a picture of Paul being persecuted by the Romans for teaching a personal salvation through the man Jesus Christ. The modern picture shows Paul exalting Jesus as God, and a multitude of accusers decrying alternative gods to the Roman state. The facts could hardly be further from the truth. While, sometimes the Greeks rioted, the majority of Paul’s persecution came from religious Jews. Paul’s gospel was legally protected in the Roman land.

Paul’s first persecution is described in Acts 9:

Act 9:22 But Saul increased the more in strength, and confounded the Jews which dwelt at Damascus, proving that this is very Christ.
Act 9:23 And after that many days were fulfilled, the Jews took counsel to kill him:

Paul (Saul) was teaching that Jesus was the Messiah (Christ) to Jews in Damascus. The Jews were expecting a Messiah that would deliver their people from the Romans. To them, Jesus was a stumbling block. He was not the Messiah they expected. For this reason, they took great offense to the notion that Christ was an obscure criminal crucified by the Romans. In Acts 9, God fearing Jews seek to kill Paul for teaching them Jesus is the Christ.

Paul continues his ministry in Antioch in Pisidia (there are multiple Antiochs in the Bible). In Acts 13 Paul teaches that Jesus is Christ and that people are saved from their sins through Jesus:

Act 13:23 Of this man’s seed hath God according to his promise raised unto Israel a Saviour, Jesus:

Act 13:38 Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins:
Act 13:39 And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.

The God fearing Gentiles (who attended the synagogue) were very receptive to this message:

Act 13:42 And when the Jews were gone out of the synagogue, the Gentiles besought that these words might be preached to them the next sabbath.

This might not be very surprising considering the reason that they are still Gentiles and not Jews is because a full conversion includes circumcision. Paul seems to be offering them a way out. The Gentiles then tell their friends and a large host arrives for the next synagogue meeting:

Act 13:45 But when the Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with envy, and spake against those things which were spoken by Paul, contradicting and blaspheming.

Religious Jews here are the ones persecuting Paul. It seems they were prepared to hear him out, just seeing large crowds convinced them it would not be a good idea. Perhaps they wanted to maintain a certain image with the people, and Paul was destroying it. They might have suspected he was a threat before and didn’t want to risk his message reaching the masses. Paul reprimands those Jews and informs them that they are hell-bound. Then after he then spreads his teaching (Jesus is Christ and can forgive sins) throughout the entire land, they persecute him:

Act 13:50 But the Jews stirred up the devout and honourable women, and the chief men of the city, and raised persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and expelled them out of their coasts.

Paul goes to Iconium and gets similar results:

Act 14:1 And it came to pass in Iconium, that they went both together into the synagogue of the Jews, and so spake, that a great multitude both of the Jews and also of the Greeks believed.
Act 14:2 But the unbelieving Jews stirred up the Gentiles, and made their minds evil affected against the brethren.

Unbelieving Jews most likely refers to Jews who did not believe Paul rather than secular Jews who did not believe in God. Like has happened a few times before and will happen in the future, God fearing Jews reject Paul’s Gospel of “Jesus is Christ” and “salvation from sins by faith”.

Paul moves on to Lystra where he heals a lame man. He does this in front of Greek cultists. They immediately claim that Paul is Mercury and Barnabas is Jupiter. The Greeks are not hostile until Jews from Iconia arrive and convince them to stone Paul:

Act 14:19 And there came thither certain Jews from Antioch and Iconium, who persuaded the people, and, having stoned Paul, drew him out of the city, supposing he had been dead.

Jews from Antioch and Iconium are persecuting Paul for this Gospel preaches earlier in Paul’s ministry, but this time it seems they stir up Pagans to do the stoning. Presumable the Greeks would try to execute him for atheism (not believing in the Greek gods).

Paul then has a confrontation with believing Jews about the need to be circumcised to be saved:

Act 15:1 And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, and said, Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.
Act 15:2 When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question.

Notice that the men saw the apostles and elders as authorities, whose words would determine what is right and wrong. Believing Jews wanted the law preached as well. Upon getting to Jerusalem, Paul confronts more believing Jews who want the same thing:

Act 15:5 But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.

After the matter is brought to the apostles a decision is made (Paul’s ministry of faith without the law is affirmed by the apostles). Paul then travels to Philippi and the Gentiles beat him after he casts out a demon of a fortune teller. The reason the crowd beat him is due to his teaching:

Act 16:20 And brought them to the magistrates, saying, These men, being Jews, do exceedingly trouble our city,
Act 16:21 And teach customs, which are not lawful for us to receive, neither to observe, being Romans.
Act 16:22 And the multitude rose up together against them: and the magistrates rent off their clothes, and commanded to beat them.

This is the first time religious Jews are not involved in Paul’s persecution. Paul was teaching customs, this was not the customs of the Jewish law but the customs refraining from pagan gods. It does not say anywhere that Paul taught to Jews here. Philippi might not have had a large Jewish congregation. Contrast how this city is treated to the next city they visit, Thessalonica:

Act 17:1 Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where was a synagogue of the Jews:
Act 17:2 And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures,
Act 17:3 Opening and alleging, that Christ must needs have suffered, and risen again from the dead; and that this Jesus, whom I preach unto you, is Christ.
Act 17:4 And some of them believed, and consorted with Paul and Silas; and of the devout Greeks a great multitude, and of the chief women not a few.
Act 17:5 But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason, and sought to bring them out to the people.

Here again Paul is preaching to religious Jews and God-fear Gentiles. Again the gentiles are receptive but the Jews seek to harm him. He the flees to Berea where the Jews and Gentiles are both receptive, but then Jews from Thessalonica come and stir up the people:

Act 17:10 And the brethren immediately sent away Paul and Silas by night unto Berea: who coming thither went into the synagogue of the Jews.
Act 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.
Act 17:12 Therefore many of them believed; also of honourable women which were Greeks, and of men, not a few.
Act 17:13 But when the Jews of Thessalonica had knowledge that the word of God was preached of Paul at Berea, they came thither also, and stirred up the people.

Paul goes to Athens, where no persecution takes place, and then goes to Corinth and preaches for a year and six months until religious Jews seek to have him disposed via the legal system:

Act 18:12 And when Gallio was the deputy of Achaia, the Jews made insurrection with one accord against Paul, and brought him to the judgment seat,
Act 18:13 Saying, This fellow persuadeth men to worship God contrary to the law.
Act 18:14 And when Paul was now about to open his mouth, Gallio said unto the Jews, If it were a matter of wrong or wicked lewdness, O ye Jews, reason would that I should bear with you:
Act 18:15 But if it be a question of words and names, and of your law, look ye to it; for I will be no judge of such matters.
Act 18:16 And he drave them from the judgment seat.
Act 18:17 Then all the Greeks took Sosthenes, the chief ruler of the synagogue, and beat him before the judgment seat. And Gallio cared for none of those things.

Their complaint was that he taught contrary to the law. This was the Old Testament law, as Gallio makes clear when he finds no criminal violations in Paul. He then turns Paul over to the Jews, who beat him. Paul goes on preaching and eventually winds up at Ephesus. At first he preaches in the synagogues but eventually is forced out and disputes instead in the school of Tyrannus. Eventually everyone in Asia has heard of his message, so much so that the idol crafters begin fearing for their jobs and decided to start a riot.

Act 19:29 And the whole city was filled with confusion: and having caught Gaius and Aristarchus, men of Macedonia, Paul’s companions in travel, they rushed with one accord into the theatre.

Although Paul was not present in the theater, his companions were in danger because his teachings threatened the idol craftsmen. The crowd is finally dispersed by an official who explains they haven’t done anything illegal and the riot might look unfavorably on them from Rome.

Paul goes to Greece (Ephesus is in Turkey), and there again religious Jews wish him harm:

Act 20:3 And there abode three months. And when the Jews laid wait for him, as he was about to sail into Syria, he purposed to return through Macedonia.

After he returns to Jerusalem for the final time, the religious Jews target him and attempt to kill him:

Act 21:27 And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews which were of Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people, and laid hands on him,
Act 21:28 Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place.
Act 21:29 (For they had seen before with him in the city Trophimus an Ephesian, whom they supposed that Paul had brought into the temple.)
Act 21:30 And all the city was moved, and the people ran together: and they took Paul, and drew him out of the temple: and forthwith the doors were shut.
Act 21:31 And as they went about to kill him, tidings came unto the chief captain of the band, that all Jerusalem was in an uproar.

Here religious Jews from Asia (they had heard his preaching abroad although he was not preaching in Jerusalem) are leading a mob to kill Paul due to past teachings against the law. Paul is saved by the Roman authorities, but the Jews keep plotting to kill him. The form pacts (Acts 23:12). They draw up plans (Acts 23:15). They influence the Romans to keep Paul imprisoned (Acts 24:27). They attempt to get Roman authorities to go along with murder (Acts 25:2-3).

Paul is bound by the Romans for 4 years, not due to Roman law, but because the Jews wished him bound. Unwritten in Acts is Paul’s subsequent meeting with Nero, Nero’s plan to scapegoat the Christians for a fire in Rome, and Paul’s execution on false charges.

Paul was primarily persecuted by religious Jews who were offended that he taught:

1. Jesus was the Christ
2. Not to follow the works of the law
3. That gentiles and Jews were equal

Here also had a couple confrontations with Christian Jews concerning the law. Notice that they were believers and zealous for the law. Notice also the other apostles were not persecuted (because they taught circumcision).

The few times Paul was persecuted by gentiles were due to money troubles. First the demon possessed fortune teller and then the idol craftsmen. Paul’s final persecution was at the hand of Nero as a scapegoat.

Posted in Bible, Dispensationalism, History, Theology | 8 Comments

Disabling America: The Unintended Consequences of the Government’s Protection of the Handicapped

I have been searching for this video for a while. This is a must watch. Handicapped author Greg Perry explains how ADA hurts the disabled:

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/Handic

Posted in Economics, Goverment | 3 Comments

on the progessives hurting the poor

Progressive history is filled with people preempting the free actions of others. The example I point to most often comes from Thomas Sowell’s book The Quest for Cosmic Justice:

The fact that people were literally starving to death in the streets of Ireland during the potato famine of the 1840s likewise lent urgency to the desire of Irish immigrants in America to get their families moved across the Atlantic. With the Irish, as with the Jews, most immigrants crossed the ocean with their passages paid by members of their respective groups living in America. So did many people from other immigrant groups. Some of the worst housing conditions were endured by Italian men, living up to ten to a room and sending money back to their families in Italy.

Reformers who reacted to the slums before their eyes, and to their own sense of social injustice, had nothing to force them to face the trade-offs inescapably faced by the people living in those slums. Even the fact that slum-dwellers often joined with slum landlords to physically resist being evicted by the authorities from housing declared “sub-standard” did not cause Jacob Riis or many other reformers to reconsider whether what they were doing was really in the best interests of the people whose interests they were ostensibly protecting. It is all too easy for people with more formal schooling to believe that they know better than those directly concerned.

Posted in History, Leftists, Sowell | 3 Comments

on mayan torture

From David Diamond’s Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed:

Archaeologists for a long time believed the ancient Maya to be gentle and peaceful people. We now know that Maya warfare was intense, chronic, and unresolvable, because limitations of food supply and transportation made it impossible for any Maya principality to unite the whole region in an empire, in the way that the Aztecs and Incas united Central Mexico and the Andes, respectively. The archaeological record shows that wars became more intense and frequent towards the time of the Classic collapse. That evidence comes from discoveries of several types over the last 55 years: archaeological excavations of massive fortifications surrounding many Maya sites; vivid depictions of warfare and captives on stone monuments, vases (Plate 14), and on the famous painted murals discovered in 1946 at Bonampak; and the decipherment of Maya writing, much of which proved to consist of royal inscriptions boasting of conquests. Maya kings fought to take one another captive, one of the unfortunate losers being Copan’s King 18 Rabbit. Captives were tortured in unpleasant ways depicted clearly on the monuments and murals (such as yanking fingers out of sockets, pulling out teeth, cutting off the lower jaw, trimming off the lips and fingertips, pulling out the fingernails, and driving a pin through the lips), culminating (sometimes several years later) in the sacrifice of the captive in other equally unpleasant ways (such as tying the captive up into a ball by binding the arms and legs together, then rolling the balled-up captive down the steep stone staircase of a temple).

Posted in History, Human Nature | 1 Comment